Freedome vs Order.

Where does one draw the line between individual independence and the ability to maintain cast? The two often conflict. When the constabulary demands obedience, it promotes order but restricting individual license. When the individuals are presumption over comp allowe freedom, are social order might be threatened. When distributen complete freedom its in commonwealths nature to churn up the power and not intromit responsibility. I think populate pass on never be happy. Once you give them order in the society they feel oppressed and in one case they get to more than freedom they cry turn up for order because all stone breaks loose. The best thing is to do is to promote order with out oppressing too much freedom. How would you do that? Well give people order but at the same time let them have at that place freedom. permit people do what they trust to do as capacious as its not pain anyone or anything. Such a compromise is really tight to match even in the anima l world. Take a wild sheep. It can hurl anywhere it necessitates. But it whitethorn wander off where there is no grass, and starve. It may wander where there is a wolf, and be eaten. The sheep has absolute freedom, but no safety or security. directly consider the sheep that lives with a husbandman. This sheep is abruptly safe.

The husbandman will burden any wolf that comes near. If the sheep is ill, the farmer will give it medicine. The farmer will make for sure that the sheep has grass and water. Life is ripe for the sheep. Just that the sheep has no freedom and the farmer may take away the sheeps wo ol show up whenever it is needed. Or he may! even kill the sheep for viands when it is old. Sheep are not intelligent and do not vex about freedom. But... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper