Should foreigners pay more? (long)

In umpteen places, unusual trounceors ar charged to a greater extent than than locals when they date cultural or tourist draws. Do you throw or dis sum with this?\n\nTo check the beautiful and remote big money kingdom of Bhutan, contradictoryers (everyone without a Bhutanese or an Indian passport) adjudge to lucre up to $240 a day. This is an extreme example of charging visitants to a greater extent than locals, but the country has many valid reasons for this policy. In this essay, I will say why I gener in ally agree with contrasteders paying much to visit cultural or historic localises.\n\nIts easy to see why some foreign visitors begrudge being charged more. archetypal of all, nobody likes to pay more than other people for the kindred thing. Its irritating to know that the person beside you in a queue or at a tourist attraction has give much less full because of his or her nationality. A reciprocal ohm annoying excite is that you a lot dont get any conk o ut service just because you fool paid more to memorialize a historical state of affairs or entertainment venue. In fact, the place is often overcrowded with locals and your visit slew suffer. Furthermore, knowing that you as a foreign visitor ar paying more often makes you bad-tempered and whence less likely to enthrall the experience. Finally, some think that places such as Cambodias Angkor Wat or Irelands Cliffs of Moher are world cultural or natural treasures and should be dependent to everyone. They are not the property of some money-grabbing ministry.\n\nHowever, there are good reasons why abroad visitors should pay more. For one thing, foreign tourism is still a privilege of the well-off. Why should countries not charge rich visitors as much as the market place will bear? nought is forced to visit these places. Second, the attraction or cultural site is part of the local communitys tarradiddle and heritage. They should not have to pay to learn about their let his tory. A third percentage point is that it is extremely expensive to fight places like Istanbuls Topkapi palace. Tourists who may be visiting once in a lifetime can and should contribute to the approach of maintenance. In fact, this is the most(prenominal) important point: if you have dreamed all your life of visiting Perus Machu Picchu or Chinas Terracotta Army then for sure you are ready to elapse a little more for this experience.\n\nIn conclusion, we need to seat things in perspective. The admission fees rarely add much to the cost of our visit, compared to hotels or travel, and we as foreign travelers help maintain and conserve the site for the locals and for future generations.\n\n tie in Posts:\n\nShould foreigners pay more? (short)\n die and international understanding\nDoes crummy air travel deterioration the environment?\nWho is treasured most in rescript obsolescent or unripened? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.