Unit Labor Costs Matter Much More Than Actual Levels of Pay

Nga Discuss the view that building block churn cost military issue much much than actual levels of pay. Unit elbow grease be is thecostoflabourperunitof. It is rigid by the growth of final payment and the rate of growth oflabourproductivity. Labour be include the spot range of cost employers incur when they employ proles. They include non scarce hire exclusively withal the cost of recruiting and training workers, national insurance contributions, redundancy payments and benefits in kind. Wages do, however, constitute over 80% of original labour cost.So they, together with productivity, atomic number 18 the two key influences on unit labour costs. If productivity increases at a faster rate than the remuneration paid, unit labour costs atomic number 18 likely to fall. During the recession, the UK has seen falls in real wage growth. If real wages are lower, firms may be more unforced to employ labour rather than capital. In some other words low wage growth promote r labour is comparatively more attractive than usual. Therefore with lower labour costs, firms are leaveing to employ more workers and labour intensive production methods.If a countrys firms arouse higher unit labour costs than firms in rival countries, this may make their products less price competitive. The country will be unlikely to benefit from increased exports, as a effect of a depreciating exchange rate. The increasing unit labour costs have caused firms to demand workers from abroad, who are willing to work for lower wages, to go down the cost of production. But this has caused unemployment in the UK, and on that pointfore a reduction in income. The proceeds is AD shift to the left, which decreases the rate of economic growth.Rising unit labour costs have the potential to cause cost push puffiness. This is caused by wage increases which exceed any improvement in productivity. There are those who feel that unit labour costs matter much more than actual levels of pay a nd this is becauseULC contains within it all gibe labour costs divided by output. This includes wages, national insurance and redundancy payments. Wages are only a component of ULC, which leads people to feel that it does not matter as much it is only the amount paid to a worker for working a certain number of hours.Unit labour costs trick be said to matter more because ithelps determine productivity. If original labour costs are at ? 5000 and output is 5000 units, indeed ULC would measure at ? 1. If however output increased to 10,000 units, past ULC would measure at 50p. This means that it right off costs less per worker and also shows that workers are now more productive. On the other hand, if companies were becoming less productive, thenULC washbasin help governments decide whether to apply supply-side policies or not.An example of this would be commandment and training, if a worker gains more knowledge in the field of work, then they should be able to produce more units than they did before. What can be also be noted from the graph is thatthere is a reduction of ostentation from A to B when increasing productivity. Therefore ULC are very historic and matter more than wages because it helps determine productivity, inflation and helps with decisions on supply-side policies. ULC does have some flaws however in thatsupply-side policies are not entirely determined by ULC, it can also be used to lower inflation as shown in the above graph.While it is agreed that ULC is important, some would argue that wages are more so. Wages make up 80 per penny of ULCand may suggest that wages determine ULC. If wages increased, then total labour costs would also increase. If total labour costs were at ? 20,000 and output was at 10,000, then ULC would measure at ? 2. If however total labour costs increased to ? 50,000 due to because of wages, and the level of output stayed the same, then ULC would measure at ? 5. This suggests a decrease in productivity as well as a r elatively low level of international competitiveness.In countries where minimum wage doesnt exist, wages may be considerably lower and the result from ULC would suggest high productivity but would not consider infringement of rights. To summarise, wages are more important than ULC because not only is it a significant proportion of ULC itself and can change the result independently , but it alsoallows people to see their independent income wages are more important to consumerswhereas ULC is more important to firms.In most developed countries however, there exists a minimum wage so wage abuse is not common. Also, the figures used previously assume that output remains at a fixed level, in the case that it doesnt shows more factors involved and thence weakens the actual levels of pays effect. Actual levels of pay are important, but more so to the individual than to the collective. ULC allows a broader scope of how the country is execute economically compared to others and is therefor e more important.