Strategic Change in Government Based on Organization Hierarchy Essay

strategic Change in Government Based on Organization hierarchyThe literature supports the position that there should be a relationship between the construction and organization variegate. This study was infrataken to determine how unalike organization roles, hierarchy, and sizes affect planned strategic variety. A survey means was administered to top federal government agency leadership to assess convert in their organization. The intention is to draw common relationships between organization flip and specific categories or sizes of organizations. Role of ChangeBusiness strategy and anatomical structure deal always been related. Organizational intensify involves innovation, process improvement, and organizational plan (Galbraith and Lawler, 1993). They also noted that the hierarchical structure is related to qualifyings in speed, calibre and productivity. In recent years, the pace of change has accelerated so drastically that most organizational structures and manage ment principles fuddle no hope of adjusting or adapting (Hammer and Champy, 1993). Todays changes argon discontinuous and happening at a geometric rate. Organizations must be sufficiently agile to be like a shot reconfigurable to meet new demands (Tetenbaum, 1998). Change efforts involve attempting to reduce discrepancies between the existing and the ideal (Hersey and Blanchard, 1993). The change could be a first order change that occurs in a stable system that itself remains unchanged. It could be a trice order change when fundamental properties of the system be changed much(prenominal) as the fall of communism (Hersey and Blanchard, 1993). Evolutionary changes be gradual and tip to be first order while revolutionary changes are endorse order. Both of these events could be driving the changes described in this study. Some changes are limited and incremental in nature. Strategic, system wide changes implemented downstairs crisis conditions are highly risky. Nadler and Tu shman (1990) found that all strategic organizational changes initiated infra crisis conditions with short time constraints were by far the riskiest. Such changes usually quest a change in core values. Some recent trends that have generally lead to significant changes in corporate culture are reengineering, shift to horizontal forms of organizing, total role management (Daft, 1998). These should not conflict the i... ...tudy in TQM, leadership, and organizational culture in a government agency. usual Administration Review, 56 227-236.Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). San Francisco Chandler Publishing.Scott, W. R. 1998. Organizations rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). San Francisco Chandler Publishing.Seidman, H. (1998). Politics, position, and power The dynamics of federal organization (5th ed.). new-sprung(prenominal) York Oxford University Press.Seidman, H. (1998). Politics, position, and power The dynamics of feder al organization (5th ed.). impertinently York Oxford University Press.Senge, P. 1990. The fifth discipline. New York, NY Doubleday.Tetenbaum, T. J. (spring 1998). Shifting Paradigms From Newton to chasos. Organizatinal Dynamics, pp. 21-33.Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. 1985. Organization evolution A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 7. Greenwich, CT JAI Press.United States government manual 2000. Office of the national Register National Archives and Records Administration. Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office. Strategic Change in Government Based on Organization Hierarchy Essay Strategic Change in Government Based on Organization HierarchyThe literature supports the position that there should be a relationship between the structure and organization change. This study was undertaken to determine how various organization roles, hierarchy, and sizes affect planne d strategic change. A survey dick was administered to top federal government agency leadership to assess change in their organization. The intention is to draw common relationships between organization change and specific categories or sizes of organizations. Role of ChangeBusiness strategy and structure have always been related. Organizational change involves innovation, process improvement, and organizational plan (Galbraith and Lawler, 1993). They also noted that the hierarchical structure is related to changes in speed, quality and productivity. In recent years, the pace of change has accelerated so drastically that most organizational structures and management principles have no hope of adjusting or adapting (Hammer and Champy, 1993). Todays changes are discontinuous and happening at a geometric rate. Organizations must be sufficiently agile to be right away reconfigurable to meet new demands (Tetenbaum, 1998). Change efforts involve attempting to reduce discrepancies betwee n the substantial and the ideal (Hersey and Blanchard, 1993). The change could be a first order change that occurs in a stable system that itself remains unchanged. It could be a second order change when fundamental properties of the system are changed such(prenominal) as the fall of communism (Hersey and Blanchard, 1993). Evolutionary changes are gradual and bunk to be first order while revolutionary changes are second order. Both of these events could be driving the changes described in this study. Some changes are limited and incremental in nature. Strategic, system wide changes implemented under crisis conditions are highly risky. Nadler and Tushman (1990) found that all strategic organizational changes initiated under crisis conditions with short time constraints were by far the riskiest. Such changes usually anticipate a change in core values. Some recent trends that have generally lead to significant changes in corporate culture are reengineering, shift to horizontal forms of organizing, total quality management (Daft, 1998). These should not quash the i... ...tudy in TQM, leadership, and organizational culture in a government agency. semipublic Administration Review, 56 227-236.Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). San Francisco Chandler Publishing.Scott, W. R. 1998. Organizations rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). San Francisco Chandler Publishing.Seidman, H. (1998). Politics, position, and power The dynamics of federal organization (5th ed.). New York Oxford University Press.Seidman, H. (1998). Politics, position, and power The dynamics of federal organization (5th ed.). New York Oxford University Press.Senge, P. 1990. The fifth discipline. New York, NY Doubleday.Tetenbaum, T. J. (spring 1998). Shifting Paradigms From Newton to chasos. Organizatinal Dynamics, pp. 21-33.Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. 1985. Organization evolution A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 7. Greenwich, CT JAI Press.United States government manual 2000. Office of the federal official Register National Archives and Records Administration. Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office.