Philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Philosophy - look for ExampleDonald starts his argument by stating that the human race stinkpotnot only have one form of a conceptual scheme and that there are many people involved and different themes for the understanding of the notion. Donald states that godliness still exists even in the monotheist people and thus showing an extended description of the conceptual scheme. He goes ahead to state that one idea can be very important in that it can assist in the development of greater ideas that would eventually lead to the rise of new concepts in the discipline of philosophy (Ludwig 18). David goes ahead to offer the example of the relativity theory as a product of this. In describing the theory, there is the interpretation that the theory is an improved edition of two different theories made by an early(a) philosopher. The theory is a product of the theory of general relativity and special relativity. This brings nearly the contemporary version of the theory and thus diver sifying the philosophical field of view. Further explanation of the concept of conceptual relativity leads to David explaining that there is always an underlying notion of confusion. This from the fact that a theme or a philosophical plain to receive acclamation as a part of a conceptual scheme, from conjoined ideas, there mustiness exist some sort of connection prior to the combination that would show a later pedigree of fusion in explanation. This factor has led to many rules being shunned with the statement that they do not suffer the required factors for them to be schemes. David offers an analysis and example in explaining this. This is where he states that the schemes may have diverging viewpoints and thus leading to a difference in words. However, when people with different languages share similar sentiments among other factors that may show their link, they are then termed as having a conceptual scheme. However, he argues that language diversity may offer some sort of misunderstanding in terms of the fact it can bring about vague reality. Vague reality is the form of illusion that makes the brain misunderstand or incorporate ideas in a manner that it should not. This is due to increased views from a particular language specifically brought about by different backgrounds. This in its sole entity hinders the concept of reality (Davidson 8). The ability to translate a particular language is one major factor that comes into focus when identifying whether conceptual schemes can gain diversity or it is a monotonous concept. The questioning of whether a person with completely different languages that cannot be translated between them lying in a similar manner or to a common language is a major one. The explanation offered for this is diverse among different philosophers but the conclusion made by David that it all falls down to two major notions. The first notion in relation to this theme and problem is understanding whether the lack of comment is comp lete. In terms of an incomplete translation, the understanding is that only a few words in a given sentence cannot be understood while the rest of them are clearly grasped by a member of a different language group. This, David states, gains recognition as a diversified factor in terms of conceptual schemes. However, the second notion implies that if a certain language is completely misunderstood and that the member of the